We do NOT need to know who they are - it's dangerous enough. I'm really surprised, sometimes, how little thought that people put into how hard the work these people do is, and how hard and complicated this whole 'sharing' mechanism is - it's art, and it's a crazy challenge for them, and I'm sure most group members are happy that people like what they do - but WE are not the reason they do it. There isn't "another R2R," because each group is its own entity - not like anyone else, just like the rest of us. If you're busy as hell, do you just love it when someone saunters by and says, "good work - wow! do more work for me!"? Do you take it as a compliment, or as someone just adding to a pile of other "I need this, and this, and this," x 1,000, in your "in" box? Looking at large visitor numbers does NOT mean any member of any group is visiting, to monitor any special requests from users. They do NOT do what they do because you, or me, or anyone else needs 'another surprise' - and why would they be more better because of many requests? Many requests: if you are doing what YOU love to do, because it's a challenge - like this protection scheme certainly was - then users 'requests' are just.annoying. They do what they do for their own reasons, which are likely as numerous as there are individuals in all groups. "or even more better because of many requests from the users here? I hope so!" Look, I'm not trying to be disrespectful, but it should be pretty obvious to anyone who's been paying attention the last few years, that groups' motivation does NOT come from user requests - here, or anywhere else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |